How Coreshift reduced incident response time by 70% with automated engineering workflows
When something breaks at 2am, every minute counts. Coreshift used Violet to make sure the right people are notified and the right steps are triggered before anyone even opens their laptop.
70%
faster response time
5hrs
saved per incident
4 workflows
in first week
The cost of slow incident response
For a developer tools company, reliability isn't a feature — it's the product. When something breaks in Coreshift's infrastructure, their customers feel it immediately. The problem wasn't that they lacked a response process. It was that the process was entirely manual. Someone had to notice the issue, post in Slack, page the right engineer, create a ticket, update the status page, and notify affected customers. In sequence. By hand. Often in the middle of the night.
"Our on-call rotation was burning people out. Not because of the incidents themselves but because of all the manual coordination that came with each one." — Ethan Brooks, Engineering Lead, Coreshift
The anatomy of a manual incident
Step | Owner | Time |
|---|---|---|
Detect and confirm issue | On-call engineer | 10–20 min |
Post in #incidents Slack channel | On-call engineer | 5 min |
Page relevant team members | On-call engineer | 10 min |
Create incident ticket in Linear | On-call engineer | 8 min |
Update public status page | On-call engineer | 10 min |
Notify affected customers | Support lead | 20–30 min |
Every incident cost at least an hour of coordination before any actual fixing began. For a team of 19, that overhead was unsustainable.
What they built with Violet
Coreshift built an incident response workflow that triggers the moment their monitoring system detects an anomaly. Everything that used to happen manually now runs in under 60 seconds.
The on-call engineer wakes up to a Slack message, a Linear ticket already created, the status page already updated, and customers already notified. All they have to do is fix the problem.
The results after 60 days
Metric | Before Violet | After Violet |
|---|---|---|
Time to first customer notification | 45 min avg | <2 min |
Manual coordination per incident | ~60 min | ~5 min |
Status page update lag | 30 min avg | Instant |
On-call engineer satisfaction score | 5.1/10 | 8.7/10 |
"The on-call satisfaction score going up was the thing I was most proud of. We didn't reduce incidents — we just made them significantly less painful to deal with." — Ethan Brooks, Engineering Lead, Coreshift
What they automated next
After incident response, Coreshift built a deployment notification workflow — automatically posting release notes to Slack, updating their changelog, and notifying beta users whenever a new version ships.
What's next for Coreshift
Coreshift is building a post-incident review workflow that automatically compiles a timeline of events, assigns a retrospective owner, and schedules a review meeting — all triggered the moment an incident is marked as resolved.
"We went from dreading incidents to almost not noticing them operationally. Violet handles the noise so we can focus on the fix." — Ethan Brooks, Engineering Lead, Coreshift
Coreshift
A developer tools company building infrastructure products for engineering teams.
Details
Industry
Developer Tools
Company size
19 employees
Founded
2022
Region
North America
Use case
Incident response